Dual license mit and gpl

Author: tjct

August undefined, 2024

WebThe GNU General Public License (GNU GPL or simply GPL) is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the four freedoms to run, study, share, and modify the software. The license was the first copyleft for general use and was originally written by the founder of the Free Software Foundation (FSF), Richard Stallman, for the … WebApr 7, 2024 · Differences in distribution, linking, modification, private use of open source licenses like MIT, GNU GPL, Apache 2.0, Creative Commons, BSD licenses.

Linux-Kernel Archive: Possible dual license for rbtree

WebDec 29, 2024 · Any GNU license, version N, subsumes the Apache 2.0 license provided N is at least 3. The GNU GPL, version N, subsumes all versions of the Mozilla Public … WebJun 11, 2024 · If someone purchased the MIT license and uploaded it to Github.. and the author of the GPL/MIT license saw that and got upset, could they force the uploader to identify themselves, to prove that they have genuinely paid for the MIT license, and in order to ban them from receiving any further updates/support that they paid for when they … picture of voldemort from harry potter

block-ui - npm Package Health Analysis Snyk

WebSep 17, 2024 · Reading eg this file, the author writes "Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses". So yes, you can choose which one of those licences you receive it under, and once you have done so, you need not worry about the requirements of the … Web1) The software is dual-licensed, and you can choose whichever license you want. 2) Some particular components of the software are MIT-licensed, but the work as a whole is GPL-licensed (recall that the MIT license is GPL-compatible, so MIT-licensed components may be included in a GPL'd work). WebJul 16, 2024 · dual licensing is usually done with GPL licenses to "unlock" the restrictions of the GPL license but I haven't found any cases for MIT That's because there are no restrictions in permissive licences that would justify payment to unlock. picture of v tachycardia

How do I use GPL and MIT licenses correctly? - Ask Ubuntu

html5shiv/MIT and GPL2 licenses.md at master - Github

WebSep 8, 2024 · However, one area where they differ is in the license: Linux is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) while FreeBSD uses the permissive Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) license. The GPL is a reciprocal, “share-alike” license, sometimes called a viral license: derivative works of a GPL project must also be made … WebFeb 24, 2024 · Dual licensing. Dual licensing provides a third option for distributing software. Using dual licensing, licensors can distribute software to licensees under a … top goal scorers ever in the worldWebThe correct way of expressing that the module is dual licensed under a GPL v2 variant or MIT license choice. “Dual BSD/GPL” The module is dual licensed under a GPL v2 … picture of volunteers needed

"WebSep 24, 2016 · If you have a dual licensed GPL + Proprietary licensed project, and someone contributes a GPL licensed contribution to your GPL project. Can your proprietary project still make use of the GPLed contribution without the GPL contribution infecting the proprietary portions? " - Dual license mit and gpl

Dual license mit and gpl

Why is jQuery dual-licensed (MIT and GPL)? - Quora

WebApr 11, 2024 · The spec file would have License: GPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT, not simply License: GPL-2.0-or-later. You have to include “MIT” even though some might argue that the executable is in some sense globally or “effectively” licensed under the GPL (for example, by virtue of GPLv2 section 2), or that file3.c gets implicitly sublicensed under … Web*PATCH] module.h: Fix full name of the GPL @ 2024-01-22 19:34 Diederik de Haas 2024-01-24 2:49 ` Bagas Sanjaya 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Diederik de Haas @ 2024-01-22 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis Chamberlain, open list:MODULE SUPPORT, open list:MODULE SUPPORT Cc: Diederik de Haas Signed-off-by: Diederik …

Did you know?

WebThere is a new license GPL Affero - that prohibits this; i.e. if there is a jQuery like library released under GPL Affero, the website owner has to release their own code as well! 3) … WebApr 7, 2024 · * or MIT license choice] * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 * or Mozilla license choice] * * The following other idents are available * * "Proprietary" [Non free products] * * There are dual licensed components, but when running with Linux it is the * GPL that is relevant so this is a non issue. ...

WebMay 7, 2010 · Many of the Dual Licenses state that the software is licensed using "MIT AND GPL". The "AND" is what confuses me. It seems to me that the word "AND" in the terms, means you will be licensing the product using both licenses. Most of the posts, here on stackoverflow, state that you can license the software using one "OR" the other. WebOct 10, 2010 · @buggedcom - You can dual-license the parts that were under the MIT license, but you can't dual license a combined MIT/GPL library - it must be licensed …

WebI would add a switch in the build system to enable/disable the component of my software that relies on GPLed 3rd party code and document that, if the user builds the software with that option enabled, then she must choose the GPL license. Otherwise, she is able to choose whichever license she likes. Would that be a suitable course of action? WebHowever, copyleft-next 0.3.1 says: "If the Derived Work includes material licensed under the GPL, You may instead license the Derived Work under the GPL." "GPL" is defined to include GPLv2. In practice this means copyleft-next code in Linux may be licensed under the GPL2, however there are additional obvious gains for bringing contributins from ...

WebFeb 27, 2012 · Basically it is not possible for a chunk of code to be licensed as both GPL and MIT at the same time as they are incompatible (GPL requires certain restrictions that MIT explicitly waves). A dual license is an invitation to …

WebThis software is licensed under a dual license system (MIT or GPL version 2). This means you are free to choose with which of both licenses (MIT or GPL version 2) you want to use this library. The license texts of the MIT license … picture of w2cWebAnswer (1 of 2): For maximum flexibility "If the GPL suits your project better" http://jquery.org/license/ Presumably someone could leverage a portion of jQuery in a ... picture of voltaren gelWebThe MIT (Expat) license places a few restrictions on you. These are a subset of the GPL license. Therefore, if you relicense the code under the GPL, and keep the MIT notice, then you've satisfied the terms of the MIT license and may legally redistribute the code. top goal scorers for norwich cityWebNov 23, 2014 · The BlockUI plugin is dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses. ... The MIT license is recommended for most projects because it is simple and easy to understand and it places almost no restrictions on what you can do with the plugin. If the GPL suits your project better you are also free to use the plugin under that license. picture of vyvanseWebThis software is licensed under a dual license system (MIT or GPL version 2). This means you are free to choose with which of both licenses (MIT or GPL version 2) you want to … picture of wadjetWebJun 29, 2007 · JSZip is dual licensed. At your choice you may use it under the MIT license or the GPLv3 license. The MIT License Copyright (c) 2009-2016 Stuart Knightley, David Duponchel, Franz Buchinger, António Afonso picture of volleyball gameWebMy answer was generic: dual license is beneficial for a company. Not specific: dual license is beneficial for Cisco. It might be the case you do not have benefits from dual license, but you also do not loose anything. Anyway, if SW release (for such chip) ever reaches external customer, then it matters. picture of wagon wheel